Unit 3 Homework

Document technical information

Format pdf
Size 178.3 kB
First found May 22, 2018

Document content analysis

Category Also themed
not defined
no text concepts found





Thermal Energy at the Nanoscale
Homework - Week 3
Spring 2013
1. Graphene ZA mode specific heat
In the lectures, we obtained integral expressions for the specific heat of modes that can be approximated with a linear dispersion (Debye model) and constant dispersion (Einstein model). The ZA mode
of graphene, which represents out-of-plane vibrations, is however closely approximated near the Brillouin
zone center by a quadratic dispersion relation of the form ω = CK 2 where C is a constant.
(a) Determine the maximum cutoff wavevector KQ and the corresponding cutoff frequency ωQ in terms
of the unit cell density ηa .
(b) Obtain an integral expression for the specific heat of the ZA mode as a function of temperature.
The low temperature specific heat of graphene shows a linear dependence on temperature (see Figure
1) which then becomes quadratic for temperatures greater than 100 K. Can you explain this behavior
based on your knowledge of the dispersion relation of graphene (see HW 2 for a plot) and the expression
you have just obtained in this problem?
2. Specific heat of metals
Figure 2 shows experimental measurements of the heat capacity of potassium at low temperatures.
The following temperature dependence is observed:
cv /T = 2.08 + 2.57T 2
where cv is in units of mJ/mol deg2 and T is in K.
(a) Provide analytical expressions for the y-intercept and slope of the graph. Hint: Neglect optical
phonon contribution to specific heat as the experimental data is provided for low temperatures.
(b) Assuming that the conduction electron density in potassium is 1.34×1022 cm−3 , determine the Fermi
energy of potassium. Note that the experimental data is expressed per mole of potassium, while
the heat capacity expressions derived in the lecture are per unit volume. Assume the density and
atomic mass of potassium are 0.862 g/cc and 39 amu. respectively.
(c) Potassium has a body-centered cubic (BCC) structure (1 atom per primitive unit cell) with an
atomic density of 1.33×1022 atoms/cc. Determine the Debye temperature of potassium assuming
that the three acoustic branches are replaced by a single branch of uniform group velocity.
Figure 1: Temperature dependence of the specific heat of graphene and graphite. Figure originally
published by Pop et al., MRS Bulletin, vol. 37, pp. 1273-1281, 2012.
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of the specific heat of potassium and sodium. Figure originally
published by Lien and Phillips, Physical Review, vol. 133, pp. A1370-A1377, 1964.
3. Thermal conductivity from kinetic theory
In the lecture, we obtained the thermal conductivity of a three dimensional material from kinetic theory.
Perform a similar analysis for one and two dimensional materials to obtain the following generalized
κ = cv vΛ
where d is the dimension and can take the values 1, 2 or 3. Also obtain an integral expression for the
thermal conductivity and observe the temperature dependence at low temperatures. Assume that the
velocity and mean free path are independent of temperature and carrier energy.
4. Specific heat of a diatomic chain
Consider the diatomic chain studied in week 1 with atomic masses m1 , m2 (m2 > m1 ) and a uniform atom spacing of a. Also assume a uniform spring constant g between all adjacent atoms. In this
problem, we calculate the specific heat of the diatomic chain using the Debye model for the acoustic
branch and the Einstein model for the optical branch. Assume that the constant frequency ωE in the
Einstein model is an average of the minimum and maximum frequencies of the optical branch.
(a) Show that the ratio of Einstein and Debye temperatures can be expressed in terms of the mass ratio
m2 /m1 as shown below:
+ 1+
(b) Calculate the normalized acoustic and optical phonon specific heats (normalized by ηa kB ) at normalized temperatures of T /θD = 0.2, 1 and 2. Assume a mass ratio m2 /m1 = 2. Also provide an
intuitive explanation of your numerical results.
(c) Use the online CDF tool to understand the acoustic and optical contributions to the total specific
heat as a function of temperature. Also observe how these contributions change with varying mass
ratio. Again, provide a physical explanation for the trend in the curves with varying mass ratio.

Report this document