Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time

Document technical information

Format pdf
Size 237.0 kB
First found May 22, 2018

Document content analysis

Category Also themed
not defined
no text concepts found


Rohit Khurana
Rohit Khurana

wikipedia, lookup




Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time
Review Article
Rohit Khurana1*, Praveen B Kudva1, Aanchal Sanjeev Shukla1, Hema Kudva2 and Divya Khanna3
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Jaipur Dental College, India
Department of Anatomy, Jaipur Dental College, India
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Krishnadevaraya College of dental science and hospital, Bangalore, India
*Corresponding Author: Rohit Khurana, Post Graduate, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Received: May 25, 2016; Published: June 08, 2016
Periodontally accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) also known as Wilckodontics is a relatively new treatment modality
which opens the door for successful adult orthodontics and drastically reduces the time taken to complete orthodontic treatment
with fewer complications. This approach highlights the synergistic effects of two dental fields, orthodontics and periodontics, to
improve the overall treatment of the patient. The technique dates back to early 1900s, however recent times have shown a change
in the principle and technique undertaken to perform this surgery. It is a clinical procedure that combines selective alveolar corti-
cotomy, use of bone grafts and the application of orthodontic tooth movements. It is based on the principle of Rapid acceleratory
phenomenon as described by Frost. The present article describes the clinical surgical procedure and emphasizes on the rationale,
advantages and disadvantages of PAOO.
Keywords: Periodontally accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics; PAOO; Wilckodontics; accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics;Corticotomyassisted orthodontics
PAOO: Periodontally accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics; RAP: Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon; NSAIDs: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflam-
matory Drugs; MTDLD: Monocortical Tooth Dislocation and Ligament DistractionTechnique
In recent times, we have seen a considerable increase in the number of adult patients opting for orthodontic corrections. However,
the dento-alveolar development ceases after adolescence. This may cause hinder the treatment outcome and time taken. The average
treatment time for adult orthodonticpatients is 18.7 to 31 months[1]. The incidence of root resorptionis higher due to the presence of an
aplastic, narrow, and less vascular periodontal membrane and alveolarbone[2]. This poses a challenge for both the periodontist and or-
thodontist. To overcome this, a synergistic approach involving orthodontic tooth movement along with periodontal regenerative surgery
can help creating rapid orthodontic movements while minimizing its possible side effects.
There are four types of bone remodelling techniques that include: Osteotomy (complete cut through cortical and medullary bone), cor-
ticotomy (partial cut of cortical plate without penetrating medullary bone), ostectomy (removal of an amount of cortical and medullary
bone) and corticotectomy (removal of an amount of cortex without medullary bone)[3].
The concept of surgically assisted orthodontic tooth movement has been studied since the 1800’s.In 1893, L.C. Bryan was the first to
describe corticotomy facilitated tooth movement. This was published in the textbook by SH Guiliford[4].
The major breakthrough in this field was put forth by HenrichKole in 1959. He emphasized that most resistance to tooth movement
was caused by the continuity and thickness of the dense cortical bone. This led to theory of “bony block movement” wherein he theorized
Citation: Rohit Khurana., et al. “Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time”. EC Dental Science 4.5 (2016): 869-873.
Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time
that by disrupting the continuity of the cortical bone, he was actually creating and moving blocks of bone in which teeth were embedded.
His technique included a combined radicular corticotomy and supra-apical osteotomy. His technique was limited to the cortical bone and
consisted of buccal and lingual interproximal vertical corticotomy cuts. Approximately 1 mm below the apices of the roots, these vertical
cuts were then connected by horizontal osteotomy cuts[5].
In 1975, Duker conducted a study to determine the effect of corticotomy on tooth vitality and the marginal periodontium in beagle
dogs. He concluded that the marginal bone should be preserved and the interdental cuts should be made at least 2 mm apical to the alveo-
lar crest level [6]. Suya., et al. in 1991modified the supraapical horizontal osteotomy incision and concluded that a horizontal corticotomy
would facilitate the luxation of the bone blocks [7]. This technique was further modified by Wilcko., et al. They added the concept of al-
veolar augmentation to corticotomy assisted orthodontic technique and patented the procedure as periodontally accelerated osteogenic
orthodontics (PAOO). A combination of demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA)/xenograft or a bio absorbable alloplastic graft
were used for alveolar augmentation. The pre-existing fenestrations were covered resulting in the increase of bucco-lingual thickness [8].
Principle of PAOO
It is based on the principle of Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon (RAP). RAP was first described by Herald Frost in 1983. Frost recog-
nised that original injury resulted in accelerated normal regional healing process. RAP was described as a local response of the tissue to
a noxious stimuli resulting in accelerated regional regeneration process. However, this response was directly related to the size, duration,
intensity and magnitude of the stimuli. RAP may last for four months in human bone and increase the bone healing by 10-50 times faster
than normal bone turnover[9]. Shih and Norrdin concluded that corticotoomy of the intraoral cortical bone resulted in a transient burst of
hard and soft tissue remodelling thereby accelerating the normal regional healing process[10]. Accelerated bone turnover and decreased
regional bone density are two main features of RAP which play a major role in orthodontic tooth movements.
Goldie and King reported an increase in the orthodontic tooth movement in induced-osteoporotic lactating rats [11]. Wilcko., et al.
radiographically demonstrated an osteoporotic state in regions treated with corticotomy. Computed Tomography suggested a demineral-
ization-remineralization phenomenon. They further found similar accelerated tooth movement with small cortical perforations instead
of corticotomy cuts. All these findings suggested that RAP is responsible for rapid orthodontic tooth movement [12].
Patient selection
This procedure can be carried out for all ages. A few contra-indications include dental bone loss, periodontal disease anddamaged
roots. Patients on NSAIDs are contra-indicated. This technique is useful in treating almost all cases of mal aligned teeth except Class III
Advantages [13]
Drastic reduction in the time taken for tooth movement
Incidence of relapse is low
Root resorption not reported in most cases
After AOO, there is more bone to support your teeth and facial profile
Less need for appliances and headgear (depending on the case)
The technique has its roots in proven orthopaedic research and treatments
Disadvantages [13]
Expensive procedure
Mildly invasive surgical procedure with associated risk of pain, swelling and the possibility of infection
Citation: Rohit Khurana., et al. “Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time”. EC Dental Science 4.5 (2016): 869-873.
Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time
Patients on NSAIDs cannot be treated with this technique
Class III malocclusion cases cannot be treated.
PAOO Procedure
Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics is a therapeutic procedure involving controlled surgical damage resulting in an accelerated tooth
movement. The procedure aims at modifying the balance between the resorption and opposition of bone. This helps in reducing the time
taken for the alveolar bone to resorb and thereby leading to rapid movement of the teeth without causing any damage to the periodontium. The alveolar bone comprises of lamellar bone which is configured into cortical and trabecular bone. During a healthy state, the
balance between apposition and mineralization is maintained. Due to the difference in the surface volumes between the trabecular and
cortical bone, it takes less time to remodel the trabecular bone [14]. Selective alveolar destruction leads to regional alveolar osteopenia
and increased secretion of calcium from the spongiosa. The latter may be attributed to osteoclasis and osteocyticosteolysis. This results
in a catabolic condition followed by new bone deposition. The osteoid begins to mineralize in 20-55 days [7].
Prior to the surgery, a detailed comprehensive medical history is recorded for the patient. A complete clinical and radiographic evalu-
ation is done to evaluate the periodontal status of the patient. Phase I therapy is performed to control the local factors and the patient is
recalled for the surgery. Full thickness muco-periosteal flaps are reflected both buccally and lingually. The flaps are reflected beyond the
apices of the teeth. Thorough debridement and curettage is carried out. Selective alveolar decortications are made on both buccal and
lingual surfaces. Burs or piezosurgery units may be used for the removal of bone. Interdental vertical corticotomy cuts are made extending
just apical to the alveolar crest. A scalloping horizontal cut is made apical to the apices connecting the vertical cuts. Numerous corticotomy
perforations are made in the cortical plate. bone substitutes are placed over the activated bone. The flaps are repositioned in order to get
complete closure. Use of excessive graft material should be avoided. Interrupted loop sutures are given and a periodontal pack is placed
[12]. NSAIDs are usually avoided post surgically since they inhibit the prostaglandin production and interfere with the bone growth pro-
cess. The patient is usually asymptomatic by the 3rd day and healing period may extend from 7-10 days. After complete recovery from the
procedure, orthodontist adjusts the braces about every 2 weeks. Depending on case, braces are put for 3 to 9 months. After the braces are
removed, a retainer for at least 6 months is usually recommended.
Recent Advances
Laser assistedcorticotomyis considered a highly useful non-invasive procedure. It utilizes the Erbium, Chromium doped Yttrium Scan-
dium Gallium Garnet (Er-Cr: YSGG) laser irradiation to reduce the cortical bone without reflecting the flap surgically. This leads to an
enhanced orthodontic tooth movement [15].
Monocortical Tooth Dislocation and Ligament Distraction (MTDLD) Technique
Tomaso Vercelllotti described the MTDLD technique involving two separate, simultaneous dental movements acting on opposite sur-
faces of the root. Vertical and horizontal microsurgical corticotomies are performed around tooth root surface that are in the direction of
movement. Strong biomechanical forces are immediately applied leading to the rapid dislocation of the bone and the root surface. A rapid
distraction of ligament fibres is produced on the root surfaces that are opposite to the direction of movement. These are caused due to the
dislocation forces. The final tooth movement is achieved by the application of normal orthodontic biomechanics [16].
PAOO can be defined as an inter-disciplinary treatment modality involving the orthodontist and periodontist aimed at an effective
treatment approach for adults, reduced treatment time and reduced risk of root resorption. Usually the orthodontic treatment aims only
at tooth movement; however, the introduction of this technique alters the bone levels and facilitates faster movement. It has been suc-
cessfully used to treat cases for decrowding, molar intrusion etc. However, benefits of the treatment are under scrutiny. Most importantly
patient co-operation is a necessity for the success of the treatment. Patients are usually sceptical to an addition of a surgical procedure in
Citation: Rohit Khurana., et al. “Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time”. EC Dental Science 4.5 (2016): 869-873.
Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time
orthodontics and thus patient education and motivation is an important aspect. Many authors have questioned the reduced orthodontic
treatment time without assessing the treatment quality. Randomized clinical trials are needed to ascertain the significance of bone grafting along with corticostomy.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest.
Vig PS., et al. “The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices”. American
Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 97.1 (1990): 45-51.
Reitan K. “Biomechanical principles and reactions”. In: Graber TM and Swain BF. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques”.
St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby Company (1985):101-192.
Wilcko MT., et al. “Accelerated osteogenic orthodontics technique: a 1-stage surgically facilitated rapid orthodontic technique with
alveolar augmentation”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67 (2009): 2149-2159.
Guilford SH. “Orthodontia: Or Malposition of the Human Teeth, Its Prevention and Remedy”. Philadelphia, PA: Spangler and Davis
Köle H. “Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities”. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral
Radiology 12.5 (1959): 515-529.
Duker J. “Experimental animal research into segmental alveolar movement after corticotomy”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3 (1975): 81-84.
Suya H. “Corticotomy in orthodontics”. In: Hösl E and Baldauf A, eds. Mechanical and Biological Basis in Orthodontics Therapy. Heidelberg, Germany: HütligBuch (1991):107-226.
Wilcko WM., et al. “Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding”. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 21.1 (2001): 9-19.
Frost HM. “The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review”. Henry Ford Hospital medical journal 31. (1983): 3-9.
10. Shih MS and Norrdin RW. “Regional acceleration of remodelling during healing of bone defects in beagles of various ages”. Bone6.5
(1985): 377-379.
11. Goldie RS and King GJ. “Root resorption and tooth movement in orthodontically treated, calcium-deficient, and lactating rats”.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics 85.5 (1984): 424-430.
12. Wilcko WM., et al. “Rapid orthodontic decrowding with alveolar augmentation: case report”. World Journal of Orthodontics 4 (2003):
13. TusharSakal Pathak., et al. “Wilckodontics”. Journal of Contemporary Dentistry 3.1 (2013): 15-19.
14. Frost HM. “The biology of fracture healing: An overview for clinicians. Part II”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 248 (1989):
15. MassoudSeifi., et al.“The innovated laser assisted flapless corticotomy to enhance orthodontic tooth movement”. Journal of Lasers in
Medical Sciences 3 (2012): 1-12.
Citation: Rohit Khurana., et al. “Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time”. EC Dental Science 4.5 (2016): 869-873.
Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time
16. Tomaso Vercellotti and Andrea Podesta. “Orthodontic microsurgery: A new surgically guided technique for dental movement”. The
International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 27 (2007): 325-331.
Volume 4 Issue 5 June 2016
© All rights reserved by Rohit Khurana., et al.
Citation: Rohit Khurana., et al. “Wilckodontics - A Gift of Time”. EC Dental Science 4.5 (2016): 869-873.

Report this document