RADIATION PROTECTION NO 170 Recent scientific findings and publications

Document technical information

Format pdf
Size 214.3 kB
First found Jun 9, 2017

Document content analysis

Language
English
Type
not defined
Concepts
no text concepts found

Persons

Earl Blumenauer
Earl Blumenauer

wikipedia, lookup

Wong Tai Sin
Wong Tai Sin

wikipedia, lookup

Gil Scott-Heron
Gil Scott-Heron

wikipedia, lookup

Organizations

Places

Transcript

EUROPEAN COMMISSION
RADIATION PROTECTION NO 170
Recent scientific findings and publications
on the health effects of Chernobyl
Summary report
Working Party on Research Implications on Health and Safety
Standards of the Article 31 Group of Experts
Directorate-General for Energy
Directorate D — Nuclear Energy
Unit D.4 — Radiation Protection
2011
This report was prepared by the Working Party on
Research Implications on Health and Safety Standards of
the Article 31 Group of Experts with the following
members: A. Friedl, R. Huiskamp, L. Lebaron-Jacobs,
P. Olko, S. Risica, P. Smeesters (Chairman), R. Wakeford,
S. Mundigl (Scientific Secretary).
FOREWORD
Luxembourg, October 2011
On 26 April 1986, the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, located in Ukraine about 20 km south
of the border of Belarus, suffered a major nuclear accident followed by a prolonged release
of large quantities of radioactive substances to the atmosphere, and resulting in a
widespread contamination of large territories mainly in Europe. Since the Chernobyl
accident, health effects could be observed in workers involved in emergency, recovery and
clean-up operations as well as in population groups living in highly contaminated areas in
Belarus, Ukraine and Russia.
With a view to the 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident, in 2011, the Article 31 Group
of Experts asked its Working Party on Research Implications on Health and Safety
Standards (WP RIHSS) to review recent scientific findings and publications on the health
effects of Chernobyl and to prepare a summary report.
This review relates only to observable health effects in the affected population, not to their
extrapolation to estimate possible health detriments in more remote areas, nor to estimates
of such detriment on the basis of the calculated dose to other populations.
This summary report provides an excellent overview of current knowledge on radiation doses
to the most exposed population groups due to the Chernobyl accident, and the observed
health effects which can be associated with this radiation exposure. The report covers
radiation induced cancers, such as thyroid cancer, leukaemia, breast cancer and other solid
cancers, as well as radiation induced non-cancer diseases, such as hereditary effects, birth
defects, children's morbidity, and heart diseases and cataracts of liquidators. Finally, the
report contains an extensive, while not exhaustive, list of recent scientific publications on the
health effects of Chernobyl.
The Article 31 Group of Experts congratulated the WP RIHSS for this excellent and useful
summary report and recommended the report for publication in the Radiation Protection
Series of the European Commission.
Augustin Janssens
Head of Radiation Protection Unit
3
CONTENTS
FOREWORD .............................................................................................................. 3
CONTENTS................................................................................................................ 5
Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 7
Radiation doses to the most exposed population groups ....................................................................... 7
Radiation induced thyroid cancers .......................................................................................................... 9
Radiation induced thyroid diseases other than thyroid cancers............................................................ 12
Radiation induction of cancers other than thyroid cancers ................................................................... 13
Hereditary effects .................................................................................................................................. 14
Birth defects........................................................................................................................................... 15
Other Non Cancer Diseases ................................................................................................................. 16
Follow up and research needs .............................................................................................................. 19
References ............................................................................................................................................ 19
5
Introduction
The accident at Chernobyl occurred 25 years ago, on 26 April 1986. With a view to the 25th
anniversary of this accident in 2011, the Article 31 Group of Experts asked the Working Party
RIHSS (Research Implications on Health and Safety Standards) to review recent scientific
findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl and to prepare a summary
report.
The issue of radiation induced thyroid cancers, the most striking effect of this accident, had
been thoroughly discussed on 26 November 1998 during the EC (European Commission)
scientific seminar on “Thyroid diseases and exposure to ionising radiation: Lessons learned
following the Chernobyl accident” (EC 2000) and, very recently (November 2010), updated
by Sir Dillwyn Williams, during the EC scientific seminar on “Issues with internal emitters”
(Williams 2010). The present review of radiation induced thyroid cancers will be based
essentially on this last updating.
Regarding the other health effects, the review considers recent publications, taking into
account the Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group (WHO 2005) and the
UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) 2008
Report (UNSCEAR 2011). Where necessary, some older publications were mentioned, for
clarity purpose.
Early health effects as acute radiation syndrome are not in the scope of this report.
Radiation doses to the most exposed population groups
The greatest sources of radiation dose from Chernobyl were, at different time periods, intake
of short-lived radioactive iodines (particularly 131I), external exposure from radionuclides
deposited on the ground (particularly 95Zr + 95Nb, 103Ru, 106Ru, 132Te + 132I, 140Ba + 140La,
141
Ce, 144Ce, 134Cs and 137Cs) and ingestion of radioactive caesium (particularly 134Cs and
137
Cs). In the near field (about 20 km) of the damaged reactor, fuel particles (with long-lived
radionuclides such as 238-242Pu and 241-243Am) made up the most important part of the
deposited material, together with more than 90% of the 89-90Sr. Part of the 89-90Sr was in
water-soluble and exchangeable form and asked for remedial action to avoid contamination
of the Dnjepr system (principal source of freshwater supply in Ukraine) (Berkovski 1996,
UNSCEAR 2011).
Three major groups of people were exposed to and, to a variable extent, are still being
exposed to radioactive contamination:
1. Workers (liquidators, or emergency and recovery operations workers). Those individuals
who were involved in emergency response, containment, clean-up and associated
activities at the Chernobyl site and in the contaminated areas are commonly referred to
as liquidators. This group consists of approximately 600 000 individuals, of whom about
240 000 worked in 1986 and 1987, when doses were highest, at the reactor site and the
surrounding 30 km zone.
2. Inhabitants who were evacuated or relocated from contaminated areas. In the months
following the accident about 116 000 people were evacuated from areas surrounding the
7
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
reactor in Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. A further 220 000 people were
relocated after 1986.
3. Inhabitants of contaminated areas who were not evacuated. About 5 million people
continue to live in areas of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia that were contaminated by the
accident (by convention, contaminated areas were defined as areas where the average
deposition density of 137Cs exceeded 37 kBq/m2).
The average effective dose received by the recovery operation workers between 1986 and
1990, mainly due to external irradiation, is now estimated at about 120 mSv. The recorded
worker doses varied from less than 10 mGy to more than 1,000 mGy, although about 85% of
the recorded doses were in the range 20–500 mGy. Uncertainties in individual dose
estimates vary from less than 50% to up to a factor of 5 (UNSCEAR 2011). There is not
enough information to estimate reliably the average thyroid dose for the recovery operation
workers (UNSCEAR 2011, Chumak 2007, Bouville 2006).
The effective dose estimates for individuals in the general population accumulated over the
20 years following the accident (1986–2005) range from a few mSv to some hundred mSv
depending on location, age and lifestyle factors, such as diet, or time spent outdoors. These
doses are mainly due to external exposure from a mixture of deposited radionuclides, as well
as to internal exposure from intake of 134Cs and 137Cs (UNSCEAR 2000 quoted by Cardis
2006; Bouville 2007).
The mean effective dose accumulated up to 2005 among residents in the strict control zones
(with 137Cs deposition density of 555 kBq/m2 or more) is of the order of 50 mSv, while in less
contaminated areas it is of the order of 10 mSv (Cardis 2006, UNSCEAR 2011).
The highest organ-specific dose was to the thyroid gland, primarily from ingestion of milk
contaminated with radioactive iodines, particularly 131I. A wide range of thyroid doses was
received by the inhabitants of the contaminated areas in the three affected countries. Doses
varied with age at the time of the accident, level of ground contamination and rate and
source of milk consumption.
A study was published recently regarding reconstruction of thyroid doses following the
Chernobyl accident. A population-based case-control study of thyroid cancer has been
carried out in contaminated regions of Belarus and Russia among persons who were
exposed during childhood and adolescence to fallout from the Chernobyl accident. For each
study subject, individual thyroid doses were reconstructed for the following pathways of
exposure: (1) intake of 131I via inhalation and ingestion; (2) intake of short-lived radioiodines
(132I, 133I, and 135I) and radiotelluriums (131mTe, 132Te) via inhalation and ingestion; (3) external
dose from radionuclides deposited on the ground; and (4) ingestion of 134Cs and 137Cs. A
series of intercomparison exercises validated the models used for reconstruction of average
doses to populations of specific age groups as well as of individual doses. Median thyroid
doses from all factors for study subjects were estimated to be 0.37 and 0.034 Gy in Belarus
and Russia, respectively. The highest individual thyroid doses among the subjects were
10.2 Gy in Belarus and 5.3 Gy in Russia. 131I intake was the main pathway for thyroid
exposure. Estimated doses from short-lived radioiodines and radiotelluriums ranged up to
0.53 Gy. Reconstructed individual thyroid doses from external exposure ranged up to 0.1 Gy,
while those from internal exposure due to ingested caesium did not exceed 0.05 Gy. The
uncertainty of the reconstructed individual thyroid doses, characterized by the geometric
standard deviation, varies from 1.7 to 4.0 with a median of 2.2. (Drozdovitch 2010).
8
Radiation induced thyroid cancers
An increase in the incidence of thyroid carcinoma in children was noted in the hospitals
caring for the population of the most exposed areas as early as 5 years after the accident in
Belarus and slightly later in the Ukraine and the Russian Federation (Cardis 2005). To date,
thyroid cancer has been the main direct consequence of exposure to fallout in the population
in Belarus, northern Ukraine, and the oblasts of the Russian Federation closest to Chernobyl.
Causal relation
The susceptibility of the thyroid to radiation-induced cancer had been recognized, already
before the accident in Chernobyl, in many studies, particularly for external irradiation and for
exposure in childhood (Japanese atomic bomb survivors, infants exposed to therapeutic xrays for several benign diseases,…). Nevertheless, epidemiological studies based on internal
exposures, mainly patients exposed to 131I for medical reasons, provided essentially negative
information with regard to thyroid cancer induction, which at this time suggested that the risk
was (much) lower than after external irradiation. But most of the available data were based
on exposures of adults (EC 2000).
The current views confirm the conclusions drawn during the 1995-1996 international
conferences and the 1998 EC scientific seminar:
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
the large rise in the incidence of confirmed cases of thyroid carcinoma in children
exposed to fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear accident,
the correlation of incidence and extent of fallout,
the rapid drop in incidence to near normal figures in children born more than a few
months after the accident,
all of which combine to show a causal relation between exposure and carcinogenesis
induction (EC 2000).
Size of the thyroid cancer increase
The latest UNSCEAR report mentioned that a number of 6848 cases of thyroid cancer were
reported between 1991 and 2005 in the three affected republics (the whole of Belarus and
Ukraine and the four most affected regions of the Russian Federation) amongst those under
age 18 years in 1986. There is no doubt that a substantial fraction of this excess incidence of
thyroid cancer can be attributed to exposure to radioiodine due to the Chernobyl accident
(UNSCEAR 2011).
There are several uncertainties in establishing the exact size of the increase, either as an
absolute number or as an increase in incidence. There is first a need to define the area
studied. Comparing the incidence in exposed and unexposed areas may also be complicated
by ethnic and environmental factors, and by the difficulty in defining unexposed areas, when
most of Europe was exposed to low level fallout deposition. Perhaps the biggest problem is
the increased ascertainment in areas designated as contaminated, where the general public
and health professionals will be aware of the increased risks, and are more likely to undergo
careful examination or participate in screening programmes. Observed increases in
9
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
incidence must also be considered in the light of world-wide increases in the incidence of
papillary carcinoma of the thyroid, in part at least due to increasing use of techniques like
ultrasound and fine needle aspiration (Williams 2010).
Providing an accurate estimate of the number of thyroid carcinomas attributable to the
Chernobyl accident to date is difficult because of the uncertainties involved, and the variables
which will be discussed in relation to estimates of the risk per Gray. These also influence
predictions for the future, the numbers expected up to 2065 in Europe have been estimated
with large variations, for example as 15,700 (95% UI: 3,400-72,000) (Cardis 2006) or 92,627
(Malko, quoted in Yablokov, 2009). Anyway, although the long-term magnitude of risk cannot
yet be quantified, it is expected, from many decades of follow-up of studies of populations
exposed to external radiation, that Chernobyl-related thyroid cancers will continue to occur
for many more years (Adams 2010). Moreover, if our current risk models are right about the
absence of attenuation of the ERR with attained age (or time since exposure) then we have
seen up to now only the tip of the iceberg and many thousands of cases of thyroid cancer are
still to come among those heavily exposed to radioiodine in childhood (Wakeford 2011).
Radiation signature?
A recent study shows that seven genes allow to completely distinguish post-Chernobyl
thyroid papillary carcinomas from sporadic thyroid papillary carcinomas (Port 2007).
However, a previous study concluded on the absence of a specific signature in postChernobyl thyroid cancers. The authors investigated gene expression in sporadic papillary
carcinomas and in post-Chernobyl thyroid cancers by a variety of microarray methods: the
results suggest that these gene expressions cannot be distinguished, although both tumours
are clearly distinct from autonomous thyroid adenomas. Post-Chernobyl, radiation-induced
thyroid cancers and sporadic thyroid papillary carcinomas thus most likely represent the
same disease. The authors did not exclude the possibility that further analysis will
demonstrate that the post-Chernobyl carcinomas might belong to a more homogeneous
restricted subset of carcinomas (Detours 2005).
Thyroid carcinoma risk and the modifying factors
A number of epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer following exposure to radioactive
iodines from the Chernobyl accident have been reported both in the most contaminated
countries and in other European countries. Estimates of the risk/Gy vary greatly, with excess
relative risks (ERR) from 2.15/Gy (Zablotska 2010) to more than 50/Gy (Kopecki 2006). The
results in general had wide confidence limits. The studies differ in a number of ways, the
area studied, the level of exposure, the time over which the cases were collected, the level of
confirmation of the diagnosis and the type of study (ecological or case control) (Williams
2010).
The ERR derived in the case–control and cohort studies - i.e. analytical studies in which
information is collected at the individual level - are all similar, though slightly lower than the
estimate from studies of external radiation (around 7/Gy), while ecological studies show
generally larger ERR (Cardis 2006, Ron 1995, Ron 2007).
Reporting an overall figure for the risk of developing thyroid carcinoma after exposure to
radiation conceals the effects of a number of variables. The major one is age at exposure.
10
There is no doubt that young children exposed to external radiation are at a greater risk of
developing thyroid cancer than older children, and that adults exposed to external radiation
have much lower risk. There is also no doubt that in the population exposed to fallout after
Chernobyl the risk of developing thyroid cancer was greatest in young children, falling rapidly
with increasing age at exposure. The substantial increase in thyroid cancer incidence seen
amongst those exposed as children or adolescents in Belarus, the Russian Federation and
Ukraine since the Chernobyl accident shows no signs of diminishing up to 25 years after
exposure (Williams 2010, Cardis 2006, Fuzik 2010).
As mentioned by Williams (Williams 2010),
ƒ
ƒ
ƒ
a pooled analysis of 7 studies of radiation induced thyroid cancer found the risk/Gy 5
fold higher in those under 4 at exposure when compared to those aged 10-14 (Ron
1995);
a study of thyroid carcinomas as second tumours in children receiving radiotherapy
for the first tumour found a ten fold difference in ERR/Gy between those treated
under 1 year of age, and those aged 15-20 (Ronckers 2006);
the Chernobyl data suggest a similar ratio, although possibly with the first 3 years of
life being particularly sensitive.
Information on thyroid cancer following in utero 131I or external radiation exposure is very
limited, including in populations exposed to fallout from the Chernobyl nuclear accident. A
recent study suggests that in utero exposure to radioiodines may have increased the risk of
thyroid carcinoma approximately 20 years after the Chernobyl accident, but the
epidemiological evidence to date is not sufficient to accurately quantify a difference in risk
between prenatal and early postnatal exposure (Hatch 2009).
Most studies agree that the risk to those exposed as adults, if present, is likely to be small.
This issue has been again evaluated in 2009 among A-bomb survivors who were adults (20
years or older) at the time of the bombings (Richardson 2009). Estimated thyroid doses were
positively associated with thyroid cancer incidence, but only among women (ERR/Gy 0.70;
90 % CI: 0.20-1.46). A recent study (Fuzik 2010) suggests that there may be an increased
incidence in those exposed as adults at all ages, and also that there may be a longer latent
period in those exposed at older ages. These are both important points, but this study seems
to have a major problem with ascertainment (Williams 2010).
Another major variable affecting risk is the level of dietary iodide. Administration of stable
iodide shortly before or within a few hours after exposure can of course block the uptake of
radioactive iodine, but few of those exposed after Chernobyl received stable iodine within
those time constraints.
The role of iodine deficiency and of dietary intake was studied by Cardis et al in 2005. The
risk for thyroid cancer in areas with severe iodine deficiency was found to be approximately
three fold that in areas with normal iodide levels. This study also showed that long term
supplementary iodide intake after the accident lowered the risk in both the higher and lower
iodide levels (Cardis 2005).
Poland was the only country that implemented iodine prophylaxis for almost all its children at
the time of the accident. 17.5 million doses of KI were administrated: 10.5 million doses to
children and 7 million doses to adults. 95.3% of children under 16 years received iodine
prophylaxis and 23.2% of adults took KI, although not recommended by the Health
Authorities. The recommended dosage was 15 mg for newborns, 50 mg for children under 5
years and 70 mg for all other children under 16 years. The incidence of medically significant,
11
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
but not serious, side-effects was estimated to 0.2%. The most frequently observed effects
were vomiting, skin rashes, stomach ache and headache. No severe complications in
pregnant women who took the recommended dose of KI and no permanent thyroid
dysfunction among the children were found (Nauman 1993).
The use of long-term dietary iodide administration in populations exposed to fallout
containing radioactive iodine should then be considered, particularly in iodine deficient areas.
These two variables (age at exposure and level of dietary intake) combine when considering
how to express the risk of developing thyroid carcinoma after exposure to fallout. The
ERR/Gy will be affected by both, and it will be necessary to specify the group referred to, for
example children under 3 from an iodine deficient area, rather than imply that a single ERR is
generally applicable. (Williams 2010)
Other factors relevant to the risk of developing thyroid carcinoma after radiation exposure
include genetic susceptibility. Polymorphic variants of DNA repair genes such as XRCC and
ATM have been associated with an increased risk of radiation induced thyroid cancer, both
after Chernobyl and after exposure to nuclear tests, but they have also been linked to
sporadic thyroid cancers (Williams 2010, Adjadj 2009, Akulevitch 2009, Bastos 2009).
Clinical aspects
Studies of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident allow studies of the changes with
latency, as there have been such a large number of cases of one type of tumour where it can
be presumed that the mutation initiating the carcinogenic process occurred within a few days
or weeks of 26 April 1986. With increasing latency the papillary carcinomas (PTCs) that form
the great majority of the radiation induced cases have become smaller in size, and clinically
less aggressive (Williams 2010, Demidchik 2006). Pathology studies have shown that the
PTCs are more mature, with solid type tumours predominating in the early cases, and classic
type PTCs in the later cases. Molecular findings in the PTCs have also changed with latency,
initial studies found that almost all showed a RET-PTC rearrangement, dominantly RETPTC3. With increasing latency the proportion of cases with RET-PTC rearrangements has
fallen, and an increasing proportion of these have been RET-PTC1 (Williams 2010).
Molecular studies are still ongoing.
Radiation induced thyroid diseases other than thyroid cancers
Some recent studies and reviews have evaluated the incidence of radiation induced thyroid
diseases other than thyroid cancers (Hatch 2010, Ron 2010, Agate 2008, Ostroumova 2009).
In a recent review, Ron and Brenner (Ron 2010) tried to evaluate the evidence regarding
structural (tumours, nodules), functional (hyper- and hypothyroidism), and autoimmune
thyroid diseases. After a wide range of doses of ionizing radiation, an increased risk of
thyroid adenomas and nodules was observed in a variety of populations and settings, with a
dose response appearing linear at low and moderate doses. They also concluded that
considerably less consistent findings are available regarding functional and autoimmune
thyroid diseases. Although the data are limited, acute radiation induced thyroiditis is known to
occur after 131I treatment of Grave’s disease or external-beam radiotherapy and is considered
12
to be a high-dose phenomenon. On the contrary chronic thyroiditis (chronic autoimmune
thyroiditis or Hashimoto thyroiditis) is regarded as a possible long-term consequence of
thyroid gland irradiation at low to moderate doses, but the studies regarding this issue (Abomb study, Nevada nuclear test site, Marshall Islands and Chernobyl) have until now
provided conflicting results.
As regards the Chernobyl data, the authors of a recent study (Agate 2008) on children living
in contaminated Belarussian settlements (13-15 years after the Chernobyl accident),
reported that the autoimmune reactions initially observed in several studies (6 to 8 years
after the accident) are still present but with lower levels of thyroid autoantibodies, while
thyroid function remains normal. These data suggest that the elicited autoimmune reaction
may have been transient, without triggering long term clinical autoimmune thyroid disease.
Longer observation periods are nevertheless needed to exclude later effects (Agate 2008),
as an increasing risk of autoimmune thyroiditis with increasing thyroid dose has been
reported after a long follow up, as in the most recent analysis of the Nevada cohort (age at
exposure less than 7 year, time since exposure 24-35 years) (Lyon, 2006).
Radiation induction of cancers other than thyroid cancers
Leukaemias
Amongst adults, the most meaningful evidence comes from studies of recovery operations
workers.
Recent case-control studies on Chernobyl liquidators from Ukraine (Romanenko 2008) and
from Belarus, Russia and the Baltic countries (Kesminiene 2008) found significantly
increased ERR, with a linear dose-response in the Ukraine study. These studies used
individual bone marrow radiation doses estimated by the recently developed RADRUE dose
reconstruction method. Although the pattern of results from these two studies is rather
unusual and further investigation is required to properly understand the finding, these nested
case-control studies do suggest a radiation-related risk of leukaemia among the liquidators
(Wakeford 2011).
Following the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident in 1986 a study found a notably raised risk
(ERR per Gy 78.8; CI 22.1-213) of childhood leukaemia in the heavily contaminated districts
of the Ukraine (but not in Belarus or Russia) (Davis et al 2006). As the results could be due
to a sampling-derived bias in Ukraine, the authors concluded that this study provides no
convincing evidence.
In a later study in the Ukraine (Noshchenko 2010), the risk of leukaemia was still significantly
increased among those with radiation exposure doses higher than 10 mGy, but the risk
estimate was substantially lower, raising questions about the accuracy of the data used in
these studies (Wakeford 2010).
Breast cancer and other solid cancers
Apart from thyroid cancers and leukaemias, there are currently few other clear evidence of
increase in the incidence of cancers in the most affected populations, with the possible
exception of breast cancer. A study was conducted in Belarus and Ukraine to describe the
13
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
spatial and temporal trends in breast cancer incidence. This study demonstrated increases in
breast cancer incidence in all areas, reflecting improvements in cancer diagnosis and
registration. But a significant 2-fold increase was observed, during the period 1997-2001, in
the most contaminated districts (average estimated cumulative dose of 40 mSv or more)
compared with the least contaminated districts. The increase was highest among women
who were younger at the time of the exposure. The authors concluded that it is unlikely that
this excess could be entirely due to the increased diagnostic activity in these areas (Pukkala
et al 2006).
Hereditary effects
Several studies were conducted concerning increases in the rate of minisatellite1 DNA
mutations in children born to exposed parents after Chernobyl. Studies in exposed families
from rural areas of Ukraine and Belarus are indicative of a statistically significant elevated
paternal mutation rate in the exposed families (1.6 fold increase) (Dubrova 1996, 2002).
A similar effect has been seen in the children and grand-children of men exposed to
weapons testing in Semipalatinsk (Dubrova 2002) and among irradiated families from the
Techa River population (Dubrova 2006).
However, studies conducted in families of Chernobyl cleanup workers globally failed to show
increases in the minisatellite mutation rates (Livshits 2001; Kiuru 2003: slight increase above
200 mSv; Slebos 2004: modest increase, not statistically significant; Furitsu 2005). The only
clearly positive study (Weinberg 2001) has been criticised for the methodology used (Jeffreys
and Dubrova 2001).
Finally no effect on minisatellite DNA mutations has been found in studies on the survivors of
the atomic bombing and on radiotherapy patients (exposures due to external radiation).
As the human experimental data have been so far derived from studies with small numbers
of families, as the increases of mutation rates were seen in populations from areas
contaminated with internal emitters but not in those exposed to external radiation sources
and as current data fail to establish reliable dose-effect relationships, further studies are
essential to address this issue (Bouffler 2006).
A parallel phenomenon, tandem repeat (ESTR) instability, is described in mice, where this
instability is shown to be transgenerational (transmission of genomic instability via the
germline to future generations). Consequences of transgenerational genomic instability
includes cancer predisposition among the offspring of irradiated parents and other genetic
endpoints, but available evidence is currently limited to animal studies (Barber 2006, Bouffler
1
Current genetic risk estimates for radiation are mainly based on measurement of mutation frequencies in the
mouse using some marker genes. In recent years analysis of mouse and human DNA sequence has shown
that some regions containing repetitive sequence elements, collectively known as tandemly repeated DNA loci
(TRDLs), mutate at a much higher frequency (x 1000) than the marker genes, allowing detecting changes in
mutation rate in relatively small population samples. Additionally, these mutations seem to occur far to the sites
of DNA damage (untargeted effect) and also long after the radiation exposure (delayed effect) and appear to be
predominantly point mutations. TRDLs are represented by relatively short microsatellites, long expanded simple
tandem repeats (ESTRs in mouse) and longer minisatellites (used as markers for germline mutations in
humans). Notably minisatellite mutations most probably occurs during meiosis in germ cells (this means during
all life in men but only in the early stages of in utero life in women, where oocytes are already formed during
embryogenesis) (Bouffler 2006).
14
2006). Noteworthy several studies on organisms exposed to contaminated zones at
Chernobyl are showing an increased risk of mutation in the germ line (for example barn
swallows) (Bouffler 2006). Yet the quality of the barn swallows study has been disputed and
these results need therefore careful interpretation (Smith 2008).
The human clinical significance of mini-satellite mutations is still very uncertain, but
“associations” are described with various diseases and pathogenic mechanisms and we
have currently also no knowledge as to whether minisatellite mutations play any role in
determining pregnancy outcomes (Bouffler 2006, Gatchel 2005). Further research is then
needed, including in the offspring of persons exposed after Chernobyl, as underlined in the
ARCH strategic long term research agenda for the health consequences of the Chernobyl
accident (ARCH 2011).
New molecular techniques, that overcome some of the classical limitations, are currently
being developed to test germ line mutagenicity in humans (Verhofstad 2008).
Birth defects
Although there have been many claims of an increased incidence of congenital anomalies in
children born shortly after the accident (Yablokov 2010, Busby 2009), possible birth effects
due to Chernobyl accident are not dealt with in recent UNSCEAR publications (UNSCEAR
2011), the reason being that the majority of the committee considered evidence was totally
lacking. This may be partly due to the difficulty to separate Chernobyl-related abnormalities
from those due to other causes or from the effects of increased ascertainment. A major
observation in this respect was that the prevalence at birth of the malformations recorded in
the congenital anomalies registry in Belarus showed a similar positive trend in areas of low
and high contamination and was even lower in the most contaminated regions (Lazjuk 2003).
Although the authors mentioned that the prevalence rates were assessed at the oblast level,
a level of aggregation that hides the heterogeneity of the distribution of contamination inside
each region, this being susceptible to be an ecological bias, this study has been considered
by many as offering compelling evidence of the absence of Chernobyl-related birth defects.
Yet new data have been provided later calling for more balanced conclusions.
In the framework of the Eurocat2 Workshop on Environmental Pollution organized in
Budapest on 6-7 March 2007, results of current research on environmental pollution and
congenital anomalies in Belarus have been presented. The time trend analysis of the
prevalence at birth of congenital anomalies has been extended from the large (oblast)
administrative division of Belarus to smaller entities (district), allowing taking more precisely
into account the real degree of contamination. A clear excess of the congenital anomalies
under study was then observed in the highly contaminated districts during the three first
years after the accident, when registered prevalence rates significantly exceeded as well the
pre-accidental values as the rates in low-contaminated areas. The main contributors to this
2
Eurocat (European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies) is a European network of population-based registries
for the epidemiologic surveillance of congenital anomalies. The network started in 1979, covers 29% of
European birth population through 43 registries in 20 countries.
15
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
increase were polydactyly, reduction defects of limbs and the group of multiple congenital
malformations. The (relatively common) skeletal anomalies are considered to be of
multifactorial nature but with a considerable (dominant) mutational component (Zatsepin
2007).
A recent study conducted by a researcher of the University of South Alabama (Wertelecki
2010) was focused on the Ukraine oblast of Rivne, and in particular on the Rivne sub-region
of Polissia, where one of the populations most exposed to chronic low-dose radiation from
Chernobyl lives in. This study shows that, among 96 438 births in Rivne between 2000 and
2006, the overall rate of neural tube defects (including spina bifida) is among the highest in
Europe (22.2 vs 9 per 10 000 live births). The rates of conjoined twins and teratomas also
seem to be elevated. In Polissia, the overall rates of neural tube defects are even higher
(27.0 vs 18.3, respectively; odds ratio: 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.13–1.93]), and the
rates of microcephaly and microphthalmia may also be elevated.
The malformation patterns observed suggest early disruptions of blastogenesis, manifesting
as alterations of body axes, twinning, duplications, laterality, and midline formation. The
limitations of this study include a lack of data regarding levels of low-dose radiation, diet,
consumption of micronutrients (possible folate deficiency in particular), degrees of
consanguinity and prenatal alcohol exposure. As the author underlines, these factors could
also combine their effects.
A subsequent study (Dancause 2010) tried to determine current radiation exposure routes in
Rivne-Polissia, through a dietary and activity survey to 344 women in Polissia. Alcohol intake
was low and alone does not account for the observed high rates of birth defects. Wild foods,
especially mushrooms and berries, and locally produced foods, especially milk related, were
major radiation exposure routes. The authors concluded that, twenty four years after the
Chernobyl accident, women continue to be chronically exposed to low-dose radiation at
levels exceeding current recommendations and this might contribute (especially
synergistically with alcohol consumption and micronutrient deficiencies) to higher prevalence
of birth defects in areas with high levels of radiation contamination compared to
uncontaminated areas.
Although these results are limited and possible confounding factors typical for descriptive
epidemiological studies prevent from drawing final conclusions, this sensitive issue needs
further consideration for example through high quality analytical studies in exposed
populations.
Other Non Cancer Diseases
Children’s morbidity
There are many claims concerning the health of children in the contaminated territories
around Chernobyl, which seem to suffer from multiple diseases and co-morbidities with
repeated manifestations (compilation in Yablokov 2009). The reports from international
organizations did not give until now much interest in the multiple publications by Ukrainian,
Russian and Byelorussian researchers on children’s morbidity. This is partly due to the fact
that many of these studies were not available in English but also to the fact that they often
did not meet the scientific and editorial criteria generally required in the currently peer
16
reviewed literature. The tone of Yablokov’s book also produced an uneasy feeling in readers
(Jackson 2011).
More or less recent studies brought again this issue into light, including the controversial
publications of Bandazhevsky (Bandazhevsky 2001), linking 137Cs body loads with ECG
alterations and cardiovascular symptoms in children such as arterial hypertension, and the
studies on neurobehavioral and cognitive performances in children of the contaminated
areas (for example Loganovsky 2008).
To verify these observations, IRSN conducted series of animal studies. Rats were exposed
to 137Cs contamination during several months (generally 3 months, sometimes 9) through
drinking water containing 6500 Bq/L. Intake of 137Cs was estimated to be 150 Bq/day/animal
(500 Bq/kg of body weight), a figure that is considered by the authors to be comparable with
a typical intake in the contaminated territories (based on Handl’s evaluation in Ukraine: 100
Bq/day with variations, according to geographical location and diet, from 20 up to 2000
Bq/day as in the case of special dietary habits like excess consumption of mushrooms)
(Handl 2003).
Although the animals tested in these studies did not show induced clinical diseases,
biological effects were observed on various systems: impairments in the cardiovascular
system such as an increase of CK and CK-MG, markers of possible heart muscle damage;
decrease of mean blood pressure and disappearance of its circadian rhythm (Guéguen
2008); in the Central Nervous System: EEG modifications, perturbations of the sleep-wake
cycle, regional 137Cs accumulation in the brain stem (Lestaevel 2006); molecular
modifications of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and NO-ergic pathway in the brain,
indicators of a neuro-inflammatory response, particularly in the hippocampus (Lestaevel
2008); and in various metabolic systems: alteration of vitamine D metabolism, associated
with a dysregulation of mineral homeostasis (Tissandie 2008); alteration of testicular and
adrenal steroidogenesis (Grignard 2007). These somewhat scattered and sometimes
contradictory results are difficult to interpret and the link between all these modifications is far
from being obvious.
It must be underlined that these somewhat unexpected results are obtained after relatively
modest intakes of 137Cs and that a fraction of the population in the contaminated territories
has been shown to incorporate ten times more 137Cs with their food. This justifies further
investigation in this field. IRSN is currently performing a clinical research (EPICE) on children
in the area of Bryansk, particularly on cardiac rhythm and ECG perturbations. First results
would be available in 2013.
On the ground of the fact that there is currently a lack of analytical studies in which dose and
risks of non-cancer diseases in children were estimated on an individual level, a series of
longitudinal studies have also been initiated recently in Ukraine in conjunction with the US
University of South Carolina and were devoted to children’s health, making use of the fact
that all children in the studied territory had been obliged to participate in a yearly medical
examination.
A first study (Stepanova 2008) investigated, for the years 1993 to 1998, the association
between residential soil density of 137Cs (used as exposure indicator) and blood cell
concentrations in 1251 children. The data showed a statistically significant reduction in red
and white blood cell counts, platelet counts and haemoglobin with increasing residential soil
contamination. Over the six-year observation period, hematologic markers did improve. The
17
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
authors draw the attention on the fact that similar effects and evolution were reported after
the Techa River accident in 1957 (Akleyev 1995).
A second study (Svendsen 2010) investigated, for the same years 1993 to 1998, the
association between residential soil density of 137Cs and spirometry measures in 415
children. They found statistically significant evidence of both airway obstruction and
restriction with increasing soil 137Cs. The authors advance as possible explanation a
radiation-induced modulation of the immune system leading to recurrent infections and finally
to detrimental functional effects.
Series of other studies are announced. The authors of these studies conclude by saying that
the current “optimism of the UN reports may be based on too few studies published in
English, conducted too soon after the event to be conclusive”.
As was the case with birth defects, the currently available data do not allow drawing firm
conclusions but are important enough to ask for further good quality research on morbidity in
children living in contaminated territories.
Morbidity of liquidators, particularly heart diseases
As for children living in contaminated territories, numerous studies have been published
concerning non cancer diseases in liquidators, many of them also not published in English,
and often being controversial due to a number of biases and confounding factors. As
mentioned in the ARCH strategic research agenda, due to the lack of complete high-quality
disease registries for non-cancer outcomes, specific studies of appropriate groups of
liquidators are needed, in particular regarding cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.
In a study on a Russian cohort of 61,000 Chernobyl emergency workers observed between
1986 and 2000, a statistically significant risk of ischemic heart disease was observed [ERR
per Gy = 0.41, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.78]. The mean dose was 109 mGy (Ivanov 2006). There
was also a significant risk for cerebrovascular diseases [ERR per Gy = 0.45, 95% CI 0.11 to
0.80].
In a sub-cohort of 29,000 emergency workers who arrived in the Chernobyl zone during the
first year after the accident and whose mean dose was greater than 150 mGy, the ERR per
Gy was smaller and non significantly increased for ischemic heart disease, while it was still
significantly increased for cerebrovascular diseases (0.39, CI 0.004 to 0.77).
However, the radiation risks in this large-scale cohort study were not adjusted for recognized
risk factors such as excessive weight, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, alcohol consumption,
and others.
New data on these issues and the underlying mechanisms would be available at the end of
2011 coming from the EU FP7 CARDIORISK project.
Cataracts
During the EU Scientific Seminar held in Luxembourg on 17 October 2006 about “New
Insights in Radiation Risk and Basic Safety Standards”, Norman J. Kleiman, Director of the
Eye Radiation and Environmental Research Laboratory in the Columbia University reviewed
18
the new available evidence regarding radiation-induced cataracts (EC 2007). The most
recent findings from the Ukrainian American Chernobyl Ocular Study (UACOS) (established
in 1996 to monitor the effects of this radiation exposure on the eyes of clean-up workers),
support a significant lowering of the supposed cataract “threshold” radiation dose (Worgul
2007). The evidence points to a dose threshold no greater than 700 mGy.
The data regarding radiation induction of cataracts have been reviewed by the WP RIHSS in
October 2009. Concerning Chernobyl, a new study had been published. In 2007, Chumak et
al. investigated the lens dosimetry in the above-mentioned study of a cohort of exposed
clean-up workers (liquidators) at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant and concluded that the
current dosimetric methodology provides reasonable estimates of individual γ-ray and ßparticle doses to the lens of the eye that are sufficiently accurate to have utility in this kind of
epidemiological/clinical study.
No new study regarding Chernobyl effects on cataracts have been published up to date.
An older study (Day 1995) showed a small but statistically significant excess of subclinical
posterior subcapsular lens changes in 5-17 years old Ukrainian children residing around
Chernobyl.
Follow up and research needs
Many of the cancer and non-cancer consequences of exposure to atomic bomb radiation
were not observed until decades after the event, so that other thyroid and non-thyroid effects
may occur in the future in those exposed to fallout, particularly as there are major
uncertainties over the individual doses from the Chernobyl accident (Williams 2010,
Baverstock 2006). It is therefore necessary to continue the follow up of these populations.
This follow up should make use of well-designed analytical epidemiological studies with
careful individual reconstruction and choice of appropriate controls (Cardis 2007).
In this spirit, and in the framework of the European Commission FP7, a project has been
conducted to develop a strategic long term research agenda for the health consequences of
the Chernobyl accident (project ARCH: Agenda for Research on Chernobyl Health). The
creation of a Chernobyl Health Effects Research Foundation, similar to the well known RERF
in Japan, has been suggested.
References
Reviews:
1. Baverstock K, Williams D. The Chernobyl accident 20 years on: an assessment of the health
consequences and the international response. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;
114(9):1312-7.
2. Cardis E. Current status and epidemiological research needs for achieving a better
understanding of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys. 2007 Nov;
93(5):542-6.
3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. FP 7 Project ARCH - Agenda for Research
on Chernobyl Health. Strategic research agenda: the health consequences of the Chernobyl
accident. 2011. On web site http://arch.iarc.fr.
19
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
4. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) 2008
Report, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Volume II, Health effects due to radiation
from the Chernobyl accident. United Nations, New York, 2011.
5. Wakeford R. The silver anniversary of the Chernobyl accident. Where are we now? J.
Radiol. Prot. 2011; 31: 1–7.
6. WHO. Health Effects of the Chernobyl Accident and Special Health Care Programmes;
Report of the UN Chernobyl Forum Expert Group ‘‘Health’’ (EGH). Geneva, World Health
Organisation, 2005.
7. Yablokov A , Nesterenko V and Nesterenko A . Chernobyl. Consequences of the
catastrophe for people and the environment. Ann NY Acad Sci 2009; 1181: i-xvi, 1-327.
Radiation doses to the most exposed population groups:
8. Berkovski V, Voitsekhovitch O, Nasvit O et al. Exposures from Aquatic Pathways. . In: The
radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident A. Karaoglou, G. Desmet, G.N.Kelly
and H. Menzel eds., Report EUR 16544, Luxembourg 1996.
9. Bouville A, Chumak V, Inskip P et al. The Chornobyl accident: estimation of radiation doses
received by the Baltic and Ukrainian Cleanup workers. Radiation Res 2006; 166: 158-167.
10. Bouville A, Likhtarev I, Kovgan L et al. Radiation dosimetry for highly contaminated
Belarusian, Russian and Ukrainian populations, and for less contaminated populations in
Europe. Health Physics 2007; 93 (5): 487-501.
11. Chumak V Physical dosimetry of chernobyl cleanup workers. Health Phys. 2007 Nov;
93(5):452-61.
12. Drozdovitch V, Khrouch V, Maceika E et al. Reconstruction of radiation doses in a casecontrol study of thyroid cancer following the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys. 2010 Jul;
99(1):1-16.
Radiation induced thyroid cancers:
13. Adams MJ, Shore RE, Dozier A et al. Thyroid cancer risk 40+ years after irradiation for an
enlarged thymus: an update of the Hempelmann cohort. Radiat Res. 2010 Dec; 174(6):75362.
14. Adjadj E, Schlumberger M, de Vathaire F. Germline polymorphisms and susceptibility to
differentiated thyroid cancer, Lancet Oncol 2009, 19;181-190.
15. Akulevich NM, Saenko VA, Rogonouvich TI et al, Polymorphisms of DNA damage response
genes in radiation related and sporadic papillary carcinoma. Endocr related Cancer, 2009;
16:491-503.
16. Bastos HN, Antao MR, Silva SN et al, Associations of polymorphisms of genes of the
homologous recombination DNA repair pathway and thyroid cancer risk. Thyroid 2009,
19:1067-1075.
17. Bespalchuk PI, Demidchik,YE, Demidchik EP et al, in Radiation Health Risk Sciences, ed
Nakashima M et al, Springer Tokyo, 2009.
18. Cardis E, Kesminiene A, Ivanov V, et al. Risk of thyroid carcinoma after exposure to 131I in
childhood. J Nat Canc Inst 2005; 97:1–9.
19. Demidchik Y E, Demidchik E P, Reiners C et al. Comprehensive clinical assessment of 740
cases of surgically treated thyroid cancer in children of Belarus. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 52532.
20. Detours V, Wattel S, Venet D, et al. Absence of a specific radiation signature in postChernobyl thyroid cancers. British Journal of Cancer. 2005 ; 92:1545–1552.
20
21. Detours V, Delys L, Libert F et al. Genome-wide gene expression profiling suggests distinct
radiation susceptibilities in sporadic and post-Chernobyl papillary thyroid cancers. British
Journal of Cancer, 2007, 97, 818-825.
22. EC, Thyroid diseases and exposure to ionising radiation: Lessons learned following the
Chernobyl accident. Proceedings of the EU scientific seminar 1998. Radiation Protection
121, Luxembourg, 2000.
23. Fuzik M, Prysyazhnyuk A, Shibata Y et al, Thyroid carcinoma incidence: trends with
reference to the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys 2010, published online
10.11.2010.
24. Hatch M, Brenner A, Bogdanova T. A screening study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid
diseases among individuals exposed in utero to iodine-131 from Chernobyl fallout. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2009 March 94:3: 899-906.
25. Kopecky KG, Stepanenko V, Rivkind N et al Childhood thyroid cancer, radiation dose from
Chernobyl. Radiat Res, 2006; 166: 367-74.
26. Ivanov V, Chekin S, Kashcheev V et al. Risk of thyroid cancer among Chernobyl emergency
workers of Russia. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2008 Nov; 47(4):463-7. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
27. Nauman J., Wolff J. Iodide prophylaxis in Poland after the Chernobyl reactor accident:
benefits and risks. The American Journal of Medicine, 1993; 94, 524-532.
28. Ory C, Ugolin N, Levalois C et al.. Gene expression signature discriminates sporadic from
post-radiotherapy-induced thyroid tumors. Endocrine-Related Cancer 2011; 18:193-206.
29. Port M, Boltze C, Wang Y et al. A radiation-induced gene signature distinguishes postChernobyl from sporadic papillary thyroid cancers. Radiat Res 2007; 168: 639-649.
30. Richardson DB. Exposure to ionizing radiation in adulthood and thyroid cancer incidence.
Epidemiology 2009, 20 (2): 181-187.
31. Ron E, Lubin JH, Shore RE, et al.: Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation, a
pooled analysis of 7 studies. Radiat Res 1995;141:259–277.
32. Ron E Thyroid cancer incidence among people living in areas contaminated by radiation
from the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys 2007; 93:502-11.
33. Ronckers CM, Sigurdson AG, Stovall M et al: Thyroid cancer in childhood cancer survivors.
Radiat Res 2006; 166: 618-28.
34. Williams D. Radiation carcinogenesis: Lessons from the Chernobyl accident. Oncogene,
2009; 27: s9-s18.
35. Williams D, Thyroid Cancer after the Chernobyl Accident: Lessons learned, an update. In
EC, Issues with internal emitters. Proceedings of the EU scientific seminar 2010. Radiation
Protection …, Luxembourg (in publication).
36. Zablotska LB, Ron E, Rozhko AV et al. Thyroid cancer risk in Belarus among children and
adolescents exposed to radioiodine after the Chornobyl accident. Br J Cancer. 2010 Nov 23.
[Epub ahead of print].
Radiation induced thyroid diseases other than thyroid cancers:
37. Agate L, Mariotti S, Elisei R et al. Thyroid autoantibodies and thyroid function in subjects
exposed to Chernobyl fallout during childhood: evidence for a transient radiation-induced
elevation of serum thyroid antibodies without an increase in thyroid autoimmune disease. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jul; 93(7):2729-36.
38. Hatch M, Furukawa K, Brenner A et al. Prevalence of hyperthyroidism after exposure during
childhood or adolescence to radioiodines from the chornobyl nuclear accident: doseresponse results from the Ukrainian-American Cohort Study. Radiat Res 2010 Dec;
174(6):763-72.
21
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
39. Ivanov VK, Chekin SY, Parshin VS et al. Non-cancer thyroid diseases among children in the
Kaluga and Bryansk regions of the Russian Federation exposed to radiation following the
Chernobyl accident Health Phys. 2005 Jan;88(1):16-22.
40. Lyon J, Alder S, Stone M et al. Thyroid disease associated with exposure to the Nevada
nuclear weapons test site radiation: a re-evaluation based on corrected dosimetry and
examination data. Epidemiology 2006; 17: 604-614.
41. Ostroumova E, Brenner A, Oliynyk V et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism after radioiodine
exposure: Ukrainian-American cohort study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid diseases
after the Chornobyl accident (1998-2000). Environ Health Perspect. 2009 May; 117(5):74550.
42. Ron E, Brenner A. Non-malignant thyroid diseases after a wide range of radiation
exposures. Radiat Res. 2010 Dec; 174(6):877-88.
43. Zablotska L, Bogdanova T, Ron E et al. A cohort study of thyroid cancer and other thyroid
diseases after the Chernobyl accident. Amer J Epidemiol, 2008; 167: 305-12.
Leukaemias:
44. Childhood leukaemia in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine following the Chernobyl power station
accident: results from an international collaborative population-based case-control study.
International Consortium for Research on the Health Effects of Radiation Writing Committee
and Study Team, Davis S, Day RW, Kopecky KJ, Mahoney MC, McCarthy PL, Michalek AM,
Moysich KB, Onstad LE, Stepanenko VF, Voillequé PG, Chegerova T, Falkner K, Kulikov S,
Maslova E, Ostapenko V, Rivkind N, Shevchuk V, Tsyb AF. Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;
35(2):386-96.
45. Chumak VV, Romanenko AY, Voillequé PG et al. The Ukrainian-American study of leukemia
and related disorders among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine: II. Estimation of
bone marrow doses. Radiat Res. 2008 Dec; 170(6):698-710.
46. Noshchenko AG, Bondar OY, Drozdova VD. Radiation-induced leukemia among children
aged 0-5 years at the time of the Chernobyl accident. Int J Cancer. 2010 Jul 15; 127(2):41226.
47. Kesminiene A, Evrard AS, Ivanov VK et al. Risk of hematological malignancies among
Chernobyl liquidators. Radiat Res. 2008 Dec; 170(6):721-35.
48. Romanenko A, Bebeshko V, Hatch M et al. The Ukrainian-American study of leukemia and
related disorders among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine: I. Study methods. Radiat
Res. 2008 Dec; 170(6):691-7.
49. Romanenko AY, Finch SC, Hatch M et al. The Ukrainian-American study of leukemia and
related disorders among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine: III. Radiation risks.
Radiat Res. 2008 Dec; 170(6):711-20.
50. Wakeford R. Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia and ionising radiation. In: EC (European
Commission). Childhood leukaemia – Mechanisms and causes. Proceedings of the scientific
seminar held in Luxembourg on 3 November 2009. Radiation Protection 163, Luxembourg,
2010.
Breast cancer and other solid cancers:
51. Cardis E, Howe G, Ron E et al. Cancer consequences of the Chernobyl accident. J.
Radiol.Prot. 2006 26: 127-140.
52. Cardis E, Krewski D, Boniol M et al. Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from
radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident. Int J Cancer 2006; 119: 1224-35.
22
53. Ivanov VK, Gorsky AI, Kashcheev VV et al. Latent period in induction of radiogenic solid
tumors in the cohort of emergency workers. Radiat Environ Biophys 2009 Aug; 48(3):24752.
54. Pukkala E, Kesminiene A, Poliakov S et al. Breast cancer in Belarus and Ukraine after the
Chernobyl accident. Int J Cancer. 2006 Aug 1; 119(3): 651-8.
“Hereditary” effects:
55. Aghajanyan A, Suskov I. Transgenerational genomic instability in children of irradiated
parents as a result of the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident. Mutat Res. 2009 Dec 1;671(1-2):527. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
56. Barber RC, Dubrova YE. The offspring of irradiated parents, are they stable? Mutation
Research 2006 598: 50-60.
57. Bouffler SD, Bridges BA, Cooper DN et al. Assessing radiation-associated mutational risk to
the germline: repetitive DNA sequences as mutational targets and biomarkers. Radiat Res
2006 165 (3): 249-268.
58. Dubrova Y, Nesterov V, Krouchinsky N et al. Human minisatellite mutation rate after the
Chernobyl accident. Nature 1996, 380: 683-686.
59. Dubrova Y, Grant G, Chumak A et al. Elevated minisatellite mutation rate in the postChernobyl families from Ukraine. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 71: 801-809.
60. Dubrova Y, Bersimbaev R, Djansugurova L et al. Nuclear weapons tests and human
germline mutation rate. Science, 2002, 295 :1037.
61. Dubrova Y, Ploshchanskaya O, Kozionova A et al. Minisatellite germline mutation rate in the
Techa River population. Mutation Res. 2006. 602; 74-82. Epub 2006 Sep 7.
62. Furitsu F, Ryo H, Yeliseeva K et al. Microsatellite mutations show no increases in the
chidren of the Chernobyl liquidators. Mutat. Res. 2005, 581: 69-82.
63. Gatchel JR and Zoghbi HY. Diseases of unstable repeat expansion: mechanisms and
common principles. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005 6: 743-755.
64. Jeffreys A and Dubrova Y. Monitoring spontaneous and induced human mutation by RAPDPCR: a response to Weinberg et al 2001. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 2001, 268: 2493-2494.
65. Kiuru A, Auvinen A, Luokkamaki M et al. Hereditary minisatellite mutations among the
offspring of Estonian Chernobyl cleanup workers. . Radiat. Res. 2003, 159: 651-655.
66. Livshits L, Malyarchuk S, Kravchenko S et al. Children of Chernobyl cleanup workers do not
show elevated rates of mutations in minisatellite alleles. Radiat. Res. 2001, 155: 74-80.
67. Slebos R, Little R, Umbach D et al. Mini- and microsatellites mutations in children from
Chernobyl accident cleanup workers. Mutat. Res. 2004, 559: 143-151.
68. Smith JT. Is Chernobyl radiation really causing negative individual and population level
effects on barn swallows? Biol. Lett. 2008, 4: 63-64.
69. Verhofstad N, Joost O, Linscooten J et al. New methods for assessing male germline
mutations in human and genetic risks in their offspring. Mutagenesis, 2008, 23(4), 241-247.
70. Weinberg H, Korol A, Kirzhner A et al. Very high mutation rate in offspring of Chernobyl
accident liquidators. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 2001, 268: 1001-1005.
Birth defects:
71. Busby C, Lengfelder E, Pflugbeil S, Schmitz-Feuerhake I. The evidence of radiation effects
in embryos and fetuses exposed to Chernobyl fallout and the question of dose response.
Med Confl Surviv. 2009 Jan-Mar; 25(1):20-40.
23
Recent scientific findings and publications on the health effects of Chernobyl
72. Dancause KN, Yevtushok L, Lapchenko S et al. Chronic radiation exposure in the RivnePolissia region of Ukraine: implications for birth defects. Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;
22(5):667-74.
73. Wertelecki W. Malformations in a Chornobyl-impacted region. Pediatrics 2010, 125 (4)
e836-43. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
74. Zatsepin I. Current Research on Environmental Pollution and Congenital Anomalies in
Belarus. In: Methodological Approaches to the Assessment of Risk of Congenital Anomaly
Due to Environment Pollution, Environmental Pollution Workshop, Eurocat, Budapest 2007
(Eurocat website).
Children’s morbidity
75. Akleyev A, Kossenko M, Silkina L et al. Health effects of radiation incidents in the southern
Urals. Stem cells 1995; 13 (Suppl 1): 58-68.
76. Bandazhevsky Y, Bandazhevskaya G. Incorporated caesium and cardiovascular pathology.
Int J Rad Med 2001; 3: 11-12.
77. Gueguen Y, Lestaevel P, Grandcolas L, et al. Chronic contamination of rats with 137Caesium radionuclide: impact on the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Toxicol 2008; 8:
31–40.
78. Grignard E, Guéguen Y, Grison S, et al. In vivo effects of chronic contamination with 137
cesium on testicular and adrenal steroidogenesis. Arch Toxicol 2008; 82:583–9.
79. Jackson D. Book review: Chernobyl: Consequences of the catastrophe for people and the
environment. J. Radiol. Prot. 2011; 31: 163-165.
80. Lestaevel P, Dhieux B, Tourlonias E, et al. Evaluation of the effect of chronic exposure to
137Cesium on sleep-wake cycle in rats. Toxicology 2006; 226:118–25.
81. Lestaevel P, Grandcolas L, Paquet F et al. Neuro-inflammatory response in rats chronically
exposed to 137- Cesium. NeuroToxicology 2008; 29 : 343–348.
82. Loganovsky K, Loganovskya T, Nechayev S et al. Disrupted development of the dominant
hemisphere following prenatal irradiation. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2008; 20(3); 274291.
83. Romanenko A, Kakehashi1 A, Morimura K et al. Urinary bladder carcinogenesis induced by
chronic exposure to persistent low-dose ionizing radiation after Chernobyl accident.
Carcinogenesis, 2009, 30 (11):1821–1831.
84. Stepanova E, Karmaus W, Naboka M et al. Exposure from the Chernobyl accident has
adverse effects on erythrocytes, leukocytes and platelets in children in the Narodichesky
region, Ukraine: a 6-year follow-up study. Environmental Health 2008; 7: 21.
85. Svendsen E, Kolpakov I, Stepanova Y et al. 137-Cesium exposure and spirometry
measures in Ukrainian children affected by the Chernobyl nuclear incident. Environmental
Health Perspectives 2010; 118 (5): 720-725.
86. Tissandie E, Gueguen Y, Lobaccaro JM, et al. Vitamin D metabolism impairment in the rat’s
offspring following maternal exposure to 137cesium. Arch Toxicol 2009; 83:357–62.
Morbidity of liquidators, particularly heart diseases:
87. Ivanov VK, Maksioutov MA, Chekin SY et al. The risk of radiation-induced cerebrovascular
disease in Chernobyl emergency workers. Health Phys. 2006 Mar; 90(3):199-207.
88. Ivanov VK. Late cancer and non cancer risks among Chernobyl emergency workers of
Russia. Health Phys. 2007 Nov; 93(5):470-9.
24
89. Little, M.P., Tawn, E.J., Tzoulaki, I., et al.,. A systematic review of epidemiological
associations between low and moderate doses of ionizing radiation and late cardiovascular
effects, and their possible mechanisms. Radiat. Res. 2008; 169, 99-109.
90. Little, M.P., Tawn, E.J., Tzoulaki, I., et al.,. Review and meta-analysis of epidemiological
associations between low/moderate doses of ionizing radiation and circulatory disease risks,
and their possible mechanisms. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 2010; 49, 139-153.
Cataracts:
91. Chumak VV, Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, Vitte PM, Medvedovsky C,
Bakhanova EV, Junk AK, Kyrychenko OY, Musijachenko NV, Sholom SV, Shylo SA, Vitte
OP, Xu S, Xue X, Shore RE, Dosimetry for a study of low-dose radiation cataracts among
Chernobyl clean-up workers. Radiat. Res. 167, 606-614 (2007).
92. Day R, Gorin MB, Eller AW. Prevalence of lens changes in Ukrainian children residing
around Chernobyl. Health Phys, 1995; 68(5):632-642.
93. EC, New Insights in Radiation Risk and Basic Safety Standards , Proceedings of the EU
Scientific Seminar 2006, Radiation Protection 145, Luxembourg, 2007.
94. Worgul, B.V., Kundiyev, Y.I., Sergiyenko, N.M.,et al. Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up
workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiat. Res. 2007; 167: 233243.
25

Similar documents

×

Report this document